Prophylactic anticoagulation after minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine our institutional rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer and to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of extended prophylactic anticoagulation after minimally invasive staging surgery for endometrial cancer. METHODS: All patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer who underwent minimally invasive staging surgery from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020 were identified retrospectively, and clinicopathologic and outcome data were obtained through chart review. Event probabilities and utility decrements were obtained through published clinical data and literature review. A decision model was created to compare 28 days of no post-operative pharmacologic prophylaxis, prophylactic enoxaparin, and prophylactic apixaban. Outcomes included no complications, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and major bleeding. We assumed a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: Three of 844 patients (0.36%) had a VTE following minimally invasive staging surgery for endometrial cancer. In this model, no pharmacologic prophylaxis was less costly and more effective than prophylactic apixaban and prophylactic enoxaparin over all parameters examined. When all patients were assigned prophylaxis, prophylactic apixaban was both less costly and more effective than prophylactic enoxaparin. If the risk of DVT was ≥4.8%, prophylactic apixaban was favored over no pharmacologic prophylaxis. On Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis for the base case scenario, no pharmacologic prophylaxis was favored in 41.1% of iterations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: In this cost-effectiveness model, no extended pharmacologic anticoagulation was superior to extended prophylactic enoxaparin and apixaban in clinically early-stage endometrial cancer patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery. This model supports use of prophylactic apixaban for 7 days post-operatively in select patients when the risk of DVT is 4.8% or higher.

Recent improvement in operative techniques lead to lower pacemaker rate after Perceval implant.

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to compare pacemaker rate usage following two different operating techniques for implanting the Perceval aortic valve replacement. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-centre study, we studied patients with isolated or concomitant Perceval aortic valve replacement operated on first between April 2013 and January 2016, following traditional operating techniques, with patients operated on between January 2016 and December 2020, after the adoption of a modified protocol based on different annulus sizing, higher positioning of the valve and no ballooning after valve deployment was adopted. The operations were performed by 2 surgeons, and patients were followed-up for a period of 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients, with a mean age of 77 (4.9) years, had Perceval valves implanted during the study period, of which 79% were isolated aortic valve procedures. Most patients (66.8%) underwent minimally invasive procedures. Cross-clamp time was 55.1 (17.6) min. The overall postoperative pacemaker insertion rate was 8.4%, which decreased decisively after the 2016 change in the implant protocol (16% vs 5.6%; P = 0.005), adjusted odds ratio of 0.31 (95% confidence interval: 0.13-0.74, P = 0.012). Univariable and multivariable analysis showed that larger valve size (P = 0.01) and ballooning (P = 0.002) were associated with higher risk of implanting a pacemaker. Postoperative 30-day mortality was of 4.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in the operating techniques for implanting the Perceval valve may decrease the rate of pacemakers implanted postoperatively. Although further studies are needed to confirm these results, such a risk reduction may lead to wider use of Perceval valves in the future, potentially benefiting patients who are suitable candidates for minimally invasive surgery.

Comparison of Long-Term Efficacy of MIS-TLIF Intraoperative Implants in Patients with Osteoporosis.

Osteoporosis and degenerative spinal disease are still an unsolvable surgical problem. It is still difficult to solve the complications related to postoperative osteoporosis, such as cage subsidence, displacement, and retraction. Expandable interbody cage is a recent innovation and an increasingly popular alternative to standard static cage. However, the clinical efficacy of MIS-TLIF combined with expandable cage for the treatment of osteoporosis has limited reports. The purpose of this paper was to analyze the efficacy of MIS-TLIF with expandable cage in patients with degenerative lumbar disease with osteoporosis. Patients with osteoporosis who received single-level MIS-TLIF and were followed up for at least 1 year were included. The outcome measures are as follows: clinical features, perioperative period, and neurological complications. JOA score and VAS pain score were used to analyze the improvement of patients' function. Imaging analysis included segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), intervertebral disc height (DH), and the ratio of cage height to preoperative DH (RCD). The final data analysis included 284 patients with osteoporosis. 178 patients used static cages, and 106 patients used expandable cages. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics, surgical indexes, and JOA and VAS scores between the two groups. There was no difference in SL or LL between static group and expandable group. There was no significant difference in preoperative DH between the two groups. The RCD in the expansion group was significantly lower than that in the static group. The intraoperative and postoperative sedimentation rate in the static group was significantly higher than that in the expandable group. The use of expandable cages in MIS-TLIF has shown good results for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases with osteoporosis. Through appropriate surgical techniques, the expandable cage can reduce the risk of cage sinking.

Comparison of Modified Above-Knee and Conventional Surgery with the Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein of Varicose Veins of the Lower Extremities: A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effects of modified above-knee and conventional surgery with the stripping of the great saphenous vein of varicose veins of the lower extremities. METHODS: Clinical data of patients with a varicose vein of the lower extremity from May 2016 to May 2018 were collected. A retrospective study was conducted on the patients receiving modified above-knee and conventional surgery with the great saphenous vein stripping. The baseline characteristics and long-term follow-up data were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (P > 0.05). The surgeries were successfully performed by the same group of surgeons under local anesthesia and neuraxial anesthesia. The hospital stay, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, total length, and number of incisions in the above-knee group were comparable to those in the conventional surgery group (P > 0.05). The incidence of saphenous nerve injury and subcutaneous hematoma in the above-knee group was lower than that in the conventional surgery group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in recurrent varicose vein incidences (P > 0.05). After surgery, the venous clinical severity score (VCSS) and chronic venous insufficiency questionnaire (CIVIQ-14) scores of both groups were higher than those before operation (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in VCSS score or CIVIQ-14 scores between the two groups postoperation (P > 0.05). At 24 months after surgery, the above-knee group (71.8%) and conventional surgery group (73.2%) resulted in changes of at least two CEAP-C clinical classes lower than baseline, respectively. CONCLUSION: The modified above-knee technique can ensure clinical outcomes, reduce intraoperative blood loss and complication incidences, and shorten the operative time. This gives evidence that the modified above-knee technique is worthy of clinical application.

Low incidence of venous thromboembolism after gynecologic oncology surgery: Who is at greatest risk?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the 30-day incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after gynecologic oncologic surgery and identify perioperative factors associated with postoperative VTE. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried to identify all gynecologic oncology cases from 2013 to 2019. Clinical and surgical characteristics, VTE events and 30-day postoperative complications were retrieved. Chi-square analysis and logistic regression models were performed to compare characteristics and postoperative outcomes of patients with and without VTE. RESULTS: A total of 63,198 gynecologic oncology patients were included. The incidence of 30-day postoperative VTE was 1.2% (n = 781). On multivariable analysis, postoperative VTE was significantly associated with ascites (odds ratio (OR) 1.8), disseminated cancer (OR 1.7), pre-operative albumin <30 g/L (OR 1.9), laparotomy (OR 2.8), operative time > 180 min (OR 2.0), and increased surgical complexity (OR 2.2) (all p < 0.001). The incidence of VTE was higher after laparotomy compared to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (2.3% v. 0.6%, p < 0.001). When stratified by type of gynecologic malignancy undergoing laparotomy, incidence of VTE was higher in patients with ovarian (2.4%) and uterine (2.4%) malignancies, compared to cervical cancer (1.1%) (p < 0.001). The 30-day incidence of VTE was 1.7% in 2013 compared to 0.9% in 2019 (laparotomy: 2.6% in 2013 to 1.6% in 2019 and MIS: 0.8% in 2013 to 0.4% in 2019). CONCLUSION: Postoperative VTE is a potentially preventable complication of gynecologic oncology surgery. Our findings indicate that laparotomy, ascites, disseminated cancer, longer operative time, and low pre-operative albumin are risk factors for VTE.

Recurrence after successful parathyroidectomy-Who should we worry about?

BACKGROUND: Preventing cervical reoperations is important-especially after parathyroidectomy. We sought to examine early predictors of recurrence of primary hyperparathyroidism after surgical cure. METHODS: Adult patients with sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism treated with parathyroidectomy between September 1, 1997, and September 1, 2019, with confirmed eucalcemia at 6 months postoperatively were identified. Recurrence was defined as hypercalcemia (>10.2 mg/dL) with an elevated or nonsuppressed parathyroid hormone level on subsequent follow-up. RESULTS: Parathyroidectomy was performed in 522 patients (median age, 62.1 years, 77% female) with the majority undergoing planned minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (85.4%, n = 446). After a median follow-up of 30.9 months, 13 patients (2.5%) recurred (median time to recurrence 50.2 months, interquartile range 27.9-66.5), all of whom underwent planned minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (n = 13/446, 2.9%). Recurrence was more common in those with higher (but still normal) 6-month calcium (10.1 vs 9.3 mg/dL, P < .001) or parathyroid hormone values (64 vs 46 pg/mL, P < .01). Multivariate analysis revealed that age >66.5 years, calcium ≥9.8mg/dL and parathyroid hormone ≥80 pg/mL at 6 months were associated with increased risk of recurrence. In addition, the presence of at least 1 preoperative imaging study that conflicted with intraoperative findings among minimally invasive parathyroidectomy patients (n = 446) was associated with increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio 4.93, 95% confidence interval 1.25-16.53, P = .016). CONCLUSION: Recurrence of sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism after initial surgical cure in the era of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy is 2.5%. Identification of those at risk for recurrence using 6-month serum calcium ≥9.8 mg/dL, parathyroid hormone ≥80 pg/mL, and/or potentially conflicting localization studies may inform surveillance strategies.

Hiperparatiroidismo primario: experiencia en cirugía por mini abordaje unilateral / Primary hyperparathyroidism: experience in surgery by unilateral mini-approach

INTRODUCCIÓN: En el hiperparatiroidismo primario el origen del trastorno, como su nombre lo indica, está en la propia glándula paratiroides, la cual genera una secreción autónoma y excesiva. La cirugía de las glándulas paratiroides evolucionó en forma considerable en los últimos 30 a 40 años, pasamos de exploraciones cervicales exhaustivas, hasta una época en que gracias al desarrollo tecnológico y sobre todo medicina nuclear, podemos localizar en forma preoperatoria el tejido patológico; siendo esta a su vez la base fundamental en la realización de procedimientos más selectivos. OBJETIVO: mostrar la casuística de cirugía por mini abordaje de la glándula paratiroides en el hiperparatiroidismo primario en un centro mutual de Montevideo. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Realizamos un estudio observacional descriptivo y retrospectivo. Se estudió una muestra de 18 pacientes con diagnóstico de hiperparatiroidismo primario y con sospecha de lesión única los cuales fueron intervenidos en un centro mutual de la ciudad de Montevideo entro julio de 2017 y enero de 2020. CONCLUSIÓN: La cirugía por mini abordaje de la glándula paratiroides puede ser aplicada en el hiperparatiroidismo primario en pacientes seleccionados con las ventajas de; tener un menor tiempo quirúrgico, ser ambulatoria (reintegro al hogar en pocas horas), indemnidad de la logia tiroidea contralateral, mejor resultado estético con similar tasa de éxito que la cirugía convencional.

BACKGROUND: In primary hyperparathyroidism, the origin of the disorder, as its name indicates, is in the parathyroid gland itself, which generates excessive and autonomous secretion. Parathyroid gland surgery has evolved dramatically in the last 30 to 40 years, from exhaustive cervical examinations, to nowadays when, thanks to technological development and especially nuclear medicine, we can locate pathological tissue preoperatively; this, in fact, is the fundamental basis for the performance of more selective procedures. OBJECTIVE: to show the casuistry of mini-approach surgery of the parathyroid gland in primary hyperparathyroidism in a mutual center in Montevideo. METHODS: We carried out a descriptive and retrospective observational study. We studied a sample of 18 patients diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism and a single suspicious lesion, who underwent surgery in a private center in the city of Montevideo from July 2017 to January 2020. CONCLUSION: Mini-approach surgery of the parathyroid gland can be applied in primary hyperparathyroidism in selected patients, with the advantages of a shorter surgical time, ambulatory (return home in a few hours), keeping the indemnity of the contralateral thyroid loggia, a better cosmetic result with a similar success rate than conventional surgery.

Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol compliance on patients' outcome in benign hysterectomy and establishment of a predictive nomogram model.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown to improve clinical outcomes after surgery. Considering the importance of patient experience for patients with benign surgery, this study evaluated whether improved compliance with ERAS protocol modified for gynecological surgery which recommended by the ERAS Society is associated with better clinical outcomes and patient experience, and to determine the influence of compliance with each ERAS element on patients' outcome after benign hysterectomy. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed on the women who underwent hysterectomy between 2019 and 2020. A total of 475 women greater 18 years old were classified into three groups according to their per cent compliance with ERAS protocols: Group I: < 60% (148 cases); Group II:≥60 and < 80% (160 cases); Group III: ≥80% (167 cases). Primary outcome was the 30-day postoperative complications. Second outcomes included QoR-15 questionnaire scores, patient satisfaction on a scale from 1 to 7, and length of stay after operation. After multivariable binary logistic regression analyse, a nomogram model was established to predict the incidence of having a postoperative complication with individual ERAS element compliance. RESULTS: The study enrolled 585 patients, and 475 completed the follow-up assessment. Patients with compliance over 80% had a significant reduction in postoperative complications (20.4% vs 41.2% vs 38.1%, P < 0.001) and length of stay after surgery (4 vs 5 vs 4, P < 0.001). Increased compliance was also associated with higher patient satisfaction and QoR-15 scores (P < 0.001),. Among the five dimensions of the QoR-15, physical comfort (P < 0.05), physical independence (P < 0.05), and pain dimension (P < 0.05) were better in the higher compliance groups. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (P < 0.001), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis (P < 0.001), early mobilization (P = 0.031), early oral nutrition (P = 0.012), and early removal of urinary drainage (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with less complications. Having a postoperative complication was better predicted by the proposed nomogram model with high AUC value (0.906) and sensitivity (0.948) in the cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Improved compliance with the ERAS protocol was associated with improved recovery and better patient experience undergoing hysterectomy. MIS, PONV prophylaxis, early mobilization, early oral intake, and early removal of urinary drainage were of concern in reducing postoperative complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800019178 . Registered on 30/10/2018.

Trends in the Use of Minimally Invasive Adnexal Surgery in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the utilization of minimally invasive adnexal surgery, including ovarian cystectomy and oophorectomy, among women with benign gynecologic diseases and compare the associated morbidity and mortality of minimally invasive and open surgery. METHODS: Women with benign ovarian pathology who underwent an ovarian cystectomy or oophorectomy from 2016 through 2018 in the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample and Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases were included. Patients with a diagnosis of gynecologic malignancy or concurrent hysterectomy were excluded. Population-level weighted estimates were developed, and perioperative morbidity, mortality, and hospital charges were examined based on surgical approach for each procedure. RESULTS: The cohort included 351,207 women who underwent oophorectomy and 220,893 women who underwent cystectomy, when weighted representing 547,836 and 328,408 patients, respectively, nationwide. A minimally invasive surgical approach was used in 294,190 (89.6%) patients who underwent ovarian cystectomy, and in 478,402 (87.3%) of patients who underwent oophorectomy. Use of minimally invasive surgery for cystectomy increased from 88.7% in 2016 to 91.0% in 2018, and the rate of minimally invasive surgery for oophorectomy increased from 85.8% to 88.7% over the same time period (P<.001 for both). The complication rates for ovarian cystectomy were 2.7% for minimally invasive surgery and 8.8% for laparotomy (P<.001); for oophorectomy the complication rate was 3.1% for minimally invasive surgery and 22.9% for laparotomy (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive surgery is used in the majority of women who are undergoing oophorectomy and ovarian cystectomy for benign indications. Compared with laparotomy, minimally invasive surgery is associated with fewer complications.

Pooled-analysis of efficacy and safety of minimally invasive versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal and upper ureteric stones. METHODS: We conducted a pooled analysis on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The eligible RCTs were selected from the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The reference lists of retrieved studies were also investigated. RESULTS: Our analysis included 10 RCTs with 1612 patients. Pooled data from 10 RCTs revealed the following: stone-free rate (odds ratio = 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.12,1.88], P = .004), operative time (mean difference [MD]  = 4.10, 95% CI [-1.37,9.56], P = .14), length of hospital stay (MD = -15.31, 95% CI [-29.43,-1.19], P = .03), hemoglobin decrease (MD = -0.86, 95% CI [-1.19,-0.53], P < .00001), postoperative fever (MD = 0.83, 95% CI [0.49,1.40], P = .49), and urine leakage (MD = 0.59, 95% CI [0.25,1.37], P = .22). Besides, we performed sub-group analysis based on vacuum suction effect and multiple kidney stones. For vacuum suction effect, it revealed the following: stone-free rate in vacuum suction group (P = .007) and in non-vacuum suction group (P = .19). Operative time in vacuum suction group (P = .89), non-vacuum suction group (P = .16). Postoperative fever in vacuum suction group (P = .49), non-vacuum suction group (P = .85). CONCLUSION: This pooled analysis indicated that MPCNL was a safe and effective method for treating renal stones compared with standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Besides, the vacuum suction effect in MPCNL played a more important role. When it comes to multiple or staghorn stones, the longer operative time in MPCNL could not be ignored.

Solution to prevent tumor spillage in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using the endoscopic stapler for treating early-stage cervical cancer: Surgical technique with video.

Gynecologic oncologists had originally preferred minimally invasive surgery (MIS) over laparotomic surgery for patients with early-stage cervical cancer until the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial reported a worse prognosis and more loco-regional recurrence in patients treated with MIS. Although some controversy remains, experts suggested that tumor cell spillage and aggravation may have been caused by intra-corporeal colpotomy, usage of uterine elevators, maintenance of Trendelenburg position, and tumor irritation by capnoperitoneum during surgery. Thus, we introduce a surgical procedure with some steps added to the conventional MIS radical hysterectomy for preventing tumor spillage during the surgery, which is currently being evaluated in terms of safety and efficacy through a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II study, entitled "Safety of laparoscopic or robotic radical surgery using endoscopic stapler for inhibiting tumor spillage of cervical neoplasms (SOLUTION trial: NCT04370496)".

Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Thyroid Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: Conventional thyroidectomy has been standard of care for surgical thyroid nodules. For cosmetic purposes different minimally invasive and remote-access surgical approaches have been developed. At present, the most used robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy approaches are minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT), bilateral axillo-breast approach endoscopic thyroidectomy (BABA-ET), bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy (BABA-RT), transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via vestibular approach (TOETVA), retro-auricular endoscopic thyroidectomy (RA-ET), retro-auricular robotic thyroidectomy (RA-RT), gasless transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy (GTET) and robot assisted transaxillary surgery (RATS). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate whether minimally invasive techniques are not inferior to conventional thyroidectomy. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase and Web of Science to identify original articles investigating operating time, length of hospital stay and complication rates regarding recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and hypocalcemia, of the different minimally invasive techniques. Results: Out of 569 identified manuscripts, 98 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were retrospective in nature. The results of the systematic review varied. Thirty-one articles were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to the standard of care, the meta-analysis showed no significant difference in length of hospital stay, except a longer stay after BABA-ET. No significant difference in incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and hypocalcemia was seen. As expected, operating time was significantly longer for most minimally invasive techniques. Conclusions: This is the first comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the eight most commonly used minimally invasive thyroid surgeries individually with standard of care. It can be concluded that minimally invasive techniques do not lead to more complications or longer hospital stay and are, therefore, not inferior to conventional thyroidectomy.

Disparities in Access to High-Volume Surgeons Within High-Volume Hospitals for Hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine access to high-volume surgeons in comparison with low-volume surgeons who perform hysterectomies within high-volume hospitals and to compare perioperative morbidity and mortality between high-volume and low-volume surgeons within these centers. METHODS: Women who underwent hysterectomy in New York State between 2000 and 2014 at a high-volume (top quartile by volume) hospital were included. Surgeons were classified into quartiles based on average annual hysterectomy volume. Multivariable models were used to determine characteristics associated with treatment by a low-volume surgeon in comparison with a high-volume surgeon and to estimate the association between physician volume, and morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 300,586 patients cared for by 5,505 surgeons at 59 hospitals were identified. Women treated by low-volume surgeons, in comparison with high-volume surgeons, were more often Black (19.4% vs 14.3%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.26; 95% CI 1.09-1.46) and had Medicare insurance (20.6% vs 14.5%; aOR 1.22; 95% CI 1.04-1.42). Low-volume surgeons were more likely to perform both emergent-urgent procedures (26.1% vs 6.4%; aOR 3.91; 95% CI 3.26-4.69) and abdominal hysterectomy, compared with minimally invasive hysterectomy (77.8% vs 54.7%; aOR 1.91; 95% CI 1.62-2.24). Compared with patients cared for by high-volume surgeons, those operated on by low-volume surgeons had increased risk of a complication (31.0% vs 10.3%; adjusted risk ratios [aRR] 1.84; 95% CI 1.71-1.98) and mortality (2.2% vs 0.2%; aRR 3.04; 95% CI 2.20-4.21). In sensitivity analyses, differences in morbidity and mortality remained for emergent-urgent procedures, elective operations, cancer surgery, and noncancer procedures. CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic disparities remain in access to high-volume surgeons within high-volume hospitals for hysterectomy. Patients who undergo hysterectomy at a high-volume hospital by a low-volume surgeon are at substantially greater risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality.

Postoperative venous thromboembolism in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery: Does modality matter?

OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly utilized for gynecologic cancers. While incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after MIS is low, some guidelines recommend extended chemoprophylaxis for these patients undergoing MIS. Our objectives were to determine incidence of postoperative VTE in patients undergoing MIS, evaluate differences in the incidence by MIS modality and assess the need for extended chemoprophylaxis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all patients undergoing MIS (robot-assisted, multi-port laparoscopy, single-port laparoscopy) for gynecologic cancers between January 2014 and December 2018 at our institution. Demographic and perioperative variables were collected. Patients <18 years, with benign pathology, or on preoperative anticoagulation were excluded. Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, and one-way ANOVA were performed to determine risk factors related to VTE occurrence. RESULTS: We identified 806 patients who underwent MIS with median age 61. Most had Stage I disease (81.5%) and uterine cancer (81.5%). Five VTE events occurred within 90 days following surgery (0.6%). Incidence of 90-day VTE did not differ between MIS modalities (p = 0.6). Patients with longer OR times (p = 0.004) were more likely to experience VTE. Age, smoking status, BMI, type of cancer and stage were not significant risk factors for VTE. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of postoperative VTE in patients with gynecologic cancers undergoing MIS is low and does not appear to differ by MIS modality. Given the very low incidence of postoperative VTE, extended chemoprophylaxis is unlikely to benefit patients with gynecologic malignancies undergoing MIS procedures.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Minimally Invasive and Open Surgery on Children with Neuroblastoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: Evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery in the treatment of neuroblastoma (NB) in children by a meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: This is a meta-analysis. We searched for random or nonrandomized controlled study of MIS group and OPEN surgery group for the treatment of childhood NB included in PubMed, ClinicalTrials, EMBASE, and Cochrane library before January 31, 2020. Data extraction was performed in a standard format for the included studies, including tumor diameter, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay (LOHS), complications, recurrence, and MYCN. Results: Seven retrospective studies were finally included, with a total of 571 children, including 162 in MIS group and 409 in the OPEN surgery group. Compared with the OPEN surgery group, the MIS group had reduced intraoperative bleeding (mean difference [MD] = -12.72, 95% CI: -24.84 to -0.61, P < .05), and reduced l LOHS (MD = -3.35, 95% CI: -5.55 to -1.15, P < .05) and decreased postoperative recurrence (MD = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05-0.75, P < .05). The differences between the groups were statistically significant. There was no significant difference between groups in tumor diameter (MD = -18.84, 95% CI: -48.12 to 10.43, P > .05), operation time (MD = -21.7, 95% CI: -97.52 to 54.13, P > .05), and MYCN results (odds ratio = 2.27, 95% CI: 0.56-9.18, P > .05). Conclusions: Preliminary evidence indicates that the treatment of NB with MIS has the advantages of less intraoperative bleeding, shorter LOHS, and less postoperative recurrence compared with open surgery.

Establishing minimally invasive cardiac surgery in a low-volume mitral surgery centre.

INTRODUCTION: Despite early enthusiasm, minimally invasive cardiac surgery has had a low uptake compared with novel techniques in interventional cardiology. Steep learning curves from high-volume centres have deterred smaller units from engaging, even though low-volume centres undertake a large proportion of surgical interventions worldwide. We sought to identify the safety and experience of learning minimally invasive cardiac surgery after undertaking a structured fellowship at Blackpool Victoria Hospital, a low-volume centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of outcomes for all consecutive minimally invasive cardiac surgery procedures performed via a right mini-thoracotomy at our institution between 2007 and 2017 was undertaken. Clinical outcomes included death, conversion to sternotomy, stroke, renal failure and other organ support. Cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamp times and learning cumulative sum sequential probability method curves were also assessed to determine how safely the procedure was adopted. RESULTS: A total of 316 patients were operated on for mitral, tricuspid, atrial fibrillation, septal defects or other conditions. The mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score was 7.0 (± 8.5). Conversion to sternotomy occurred in 12 patients (3.8%) and in-hospital mortality was 7 (2.2%). None of the converted patients died. The learning curves showed an accelerated process of adoption, similar to reference figures from a high-volume German centre. DISCUSSION: It is possible for low-volume cardiac surgical centres to undertake minimally invasive surgical programmes with good outcomes and short learning curves. Despite technical complexities, with a team approach, the learning curve can be navigated safely.

Decreasing utilization of minimally invasive hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of the first level I evidence (Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer [LACC] trial) on minimally invasive hysterectomy use and perioperative complications for cervical cancer surgery. METHODS: This was population-based retrospective observational study, querying National Inpatient Sample. Women with cervical cancer who underwent hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy from 10/2015-12/2018 were examined. A quasi-experimental analysis with interrupted-time series was performed to assess the influence of the LACC trial report on minimally invasive hysterectomy use and perioperative complication rates. RESULTS: 5120 women in the pre-LACC period and 1645 women in the post-LACC period were compared. Following the LACC trial report on 3/2018, the minimally invasive hysterectomy use dropped by 19.7 percent points in one month (55.2% in 3/2018 to 35.5% in 4/2018), followed by a continued decline of 8.0% (95% confidence interval 0.1-15.3) monthly. By 12/2018, minimally invasive hysterectomy was used in 17.9% of cases, which was 38.8 percent points lower than the expected rate per the pre-LACC period projection. In multivariable analysis, women in the post-LACC period were 63% less likely to undergo minimally invasive hysterectomy (adjusted-odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.42) but 23% more likely to have a perioperative complication (38.6% versus 29.1%, adjusted-odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.40) compared to those in the pre-LACC period. Women in the post-LACC group were more likely to have a longer hospital stay compared to those in the pre-LACC group (median, 3 versus 2 days, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Following the LACC trial results, U.S. surgeons rapidly shifted from minimally invasive to open hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Decreasing utilization of minimally invasive surgery was associated with an increase in perioperative complications and longer hospital admissions.

Survival rates of patients who undergo minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer with cervical involvement.

Objective: Compare the oncologic outcomes of patients with intermediate-risk endometrial cancer who were staged by minimally invasive surgery with the outcomes of patients who underwent open surgery. Methods: Data from 206 patients with intermediate-risk endometrial cancer who were treated between January 2009 and January 2019 were reviewed. The patients' data were retrieved from five institutions. The patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent open surgery and those who underwent minimally invasive surgery. Tumor characteristics, recurrence rate, disease-free survival, and overall survival were compared according to surgical approach. Results: Among the 206 patients included in this study, 76 underwent open surgery (36.9%) and 130 underwent MIS (63.1%). In patients with stage IB endometrial cancer, the recurrence rate, disease-free survival, and overall survival were not significantly different between those who underwent minimally invasive surgery and those who underwent open surgery. However, in patients with stage II endometrial cancer, the recurrence rate was significantly higher among those who underwent minimally invasive surgery (37.5% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.013). Patients with stage II endometrial cancer who underwent minimally invasive surgery had a significantly lower disease-free survival (p = 0.012) than those who underwent open surgery, however, the overall survival (p = 0.252) was similar between the two groups. Conclusion: Minimally invasive surgery results in less favorable survival outcomes than open surgery in patients with stage II endometrial cancer.

Mini-incision open appendectomy versus laparoscopic appendectomy: An experience in a rural hospital.

BACKGROUND: There is still no consensus about whether laparoscopic appendectomy should be performed in selected cases or routinely in all cases for treatment of acute appendicitis. Especially for rural hospitals with laparoscopic equipment shortages, it is critical to develop surgical methods alternative to LA. This prospective study aimed to compare mini-incision open appendectomy (MOA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) procedures. METHODS: A total of 102 patients who had been operated on by a single surgeon for acute appendicitis between July 2018 and February 2020 and whose body mass index (BMI) was <30 were included in this study. Fifty-one patients were operated on with MOA and 51 with LA technique. The patients were evaluated concerning operation time, postoperative pain, hospital stay, postoperative infectious complications and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: Operation time was shorter in the MOA group than LA group (p<0.001). VAS scores at postoperative 12th and 24th hours were significantly lower in the MOA group than those in the LA group (p<0.001). Total hospitalization costs were lower in the MOA group than those in the LA group (p<0.001). No significant difference was found between the two groups concerning length of hospital stay and postoperative infectious complications (p=0.061 and p>0.999, respectively). CONCLUSION: Mini-incision open appendectomy is a reliable method in patients with acute appendicitis who have a BMI of <30 and it is superior to laparoscopic appendectomy concerning the operation time, postoperative pain and cost.

Women as Authors of Randomized Controlled Trials of Minimally Invasive Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3 Decades of Trials.

BACKGROUND: Female authorship opportunities have lagged behind those of their male counterparts, with gender disparities most prominent in surgical specialties. Our objective was to determine trends of female first, last, and first or last authorships across time and surgical specialties and whether female first or last authorship was associated with journal impact factor. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of EMBASE (OvidSP), MEDLINE (OvidSP), and Cochrane (Wiley) databases from inception to December 22, 2017 was performed to identify all randomized controlled trials evaluating minimally invasive surgery vs classical surgical techniques. The primary end point was female first, last, and first or last authorship, with gender determined via an online search strategy and verified via Genderize.io. Secondary end point was journal impact factor, recorded from Clarivate Analytics InCites. RESULTS: There were 9,321 articles identified and 489 met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Sixty-eight (13.9%) first and 60 (12.3%) last female authors were identified. A positive linear trend for female first (R2 = 0.35, Cochran-Armitage test for trend, p < 0.001), last (R2 = 0.30, p < 0.001), and first or last authorships (R2 = 0.40, p < 0.001) over time was identified. This trend was observed across surgical specialties except for orthopaedics. The highest calculated percentages of female first, last, and first or last authorships by the year 2017 were seen in obstetrics and gynecology (33.8%, 32.0%, and 43.8%, respectively), all significantly lower than the corresponding percentage of the female obstetrics and gynecology workforce in 2017 (57.0%). Neither female first nor last authorship positions were associated with journal impact factor. CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in female first and last authorship in randomized controlled trials of minimally invasive surgical techniques in the last 3 decades has been observed, but continued efforts to bridge this gender gap are sorely needed.